|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Oct 27, 2016 0:22:35 GMT -6
www.sescoops.com/billy-corgan-claims-that-hes-seen-copies-of-tnas-correspondence-with-wwe/Billy Corgan Claims That He’s Seen Copies Of TNA’s Correspondence With WWE Another new piece of information has dropped from the latest documents in Billy Corgan’s lawsuit against TNA. Corgan had already alleged that TNA lied to him about negotiating with WWE to sell the company’s video library, but now there are more details, reported by Ryan Satin of Pro Wrestling Sheet. According to the new filing, TNA Chief Financial Officer Dean Broadhead told Corgan on September 26 that the WWE rumors were false. However, after TNA produced over 14,000 pages of documents to Corgan as part of the lawsuit, he and his lawyers found tangible proof. Those would be “certain due diligence materials that WWE had requested” the day before his conversation with Broadhead. There was also this reference to the WWE deal, which downplayed Corgan’s role in the company: “When WWE raised issues relating to Corgan’s note in the course of their negotiations, [Dixie] wrote: ‘I intend to pay the loan back in full plus interest prior to selling the company.’”
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Oct 27, 2016 0:23:29 GMT -6
www.sescoops.com/billy-corgan-claims-tna-is-telling-talent-hes-responsible-for-them-not-being-paid/Billy Corgan Claims TNA Is Telling Talent He’s Responsible For Them Not Being Paid More new documents were filed as part of Billy Corgan’s lawsuit against TNA today, and Ryan Satin of Pro Wrestling Sheet has gotten to look them over. The details continue to paint a grim picture of TNA, with a few in particular standing out. For starters, there’s this, which comes from an affidavit that Corgan filed with the court: Impact Ventures also continues to not pay its talent, except now defendants are blaming me and the temporary restraining order in this case for the lack of payment. If TNA management is in fact telling talent that, then yes, that would appear to be a lie. The restraining order, which you can read here, is primarily concerned with stopping the company from selling equity or the tape library for cash infusions. Also of note: Impact Ventures had been planning a 3-day taping scheduled for November 1-3, 2016. However, on October 25, 2016, Impact Ventures postponed that event due to lack of funds. Since TNA has no reason to return to Universal Studios until January, those dates would appear to be set aside for the tapings set to take place entirely at Matt and Jeff Hardy’s compound. That’s not for 100% sure, though. Corgan also alleges that he never got a new employment agreement after being named president of the company, which turned out to be a figurehead title. Instead, he claims that Jason Brown of Aroluxe Media is unofficially running TNA’s day to day operations. More on all this as it develops, as the hearing to determine if Corgan is underway as of this writing. Nate Rau of The Tennessean newspaper is live tweeting the hearing.
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Oct 27, 2016 0:25:24 GMT -6
www.f4wonline.com/tna-news/attorneys-tna-billy-corgan-make-their-case-court-223411ATTORNEYS FOR TNA & BILLY CORGAN MAKE THEIR CASE IN COURT BY JOSEPH CURRIER | @josephcurrier | OCT 26, 2016 2:13 PM Attorneys for both TNA and Billy Corgan were in court on Wednesday afternoon in Nashville for a hearing regarding Corgan's lawsuit against TNA Wrestling, Dixie Carter, and some of the company's executives. Nate Rau of The Tennessean was also there covering the proceedings and live tweeted the hearing's most notable moments. Much of the hearing was centered around whether or not TNA is insolvent, and Corgan's attorney Scott Sims presented that case in court when arguing for an injunction to be granted that would allow Corgan to take over the company. Unsealed documents in the lawsuit previously revealed that Corgan had a clause in his agreement with Carter that allowed him to take over much of her control and replace the company's managers it were insolvent. Sims said that TNA misled Corgan about the company's debts and excluded him from management decisions. Sims argued that TNA having offers to buy or invest in the company doesn't prove that they're not insolvent. TNA attorney Travis Parham responded to Corgan's claims, fighting back against the notion of insolvency. Parham said that cash flow was only a small part of the story. He also claimed that TNA has "good will, notoriety, merchandising, licensing, and is an international brand." Parham argued that Corgan and Carter's agreement was illegal under Tennessee law because Carter's manager rights can't legally be transferred. He called Corgan's agreement with Carter "predatory lending at its worst" and said that TNA is willing to pay off Corgan's loan. Anthem, the parent company of the Fight Network, previously offered to pay off the loan. An attorney for Anthem present at the hearing said that they were willing to pay it off, minus the transaction premium Corgan says he is due. Lawyers for both sides agreed to not publicly disclose redacted financial details about the state of the company. Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle adjourned the hearing, saying that her ruling will come on Monday. A Storify chronicling all of Rau's tweets is available below: storify.com/josephcurrier/tna-and-billy-corgan-lawsuit-hearing
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Oct 27, 2016 10:45:38 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Oct 28, 2016 9:47:38 GMT -6
www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2016/1028/618830/what-monday-ruling-means-for-tna/What Monday's Court Ruling Means For TNA Source: PWInsider As noted, there was a hearing earlier this week between Billy Corgan and TNA at the Chancery Court in Nashville, TN over the temporary injunction that Corgan has requested. The judge announced that a ruling will come this Monday. PWInsider notes that if the ruling is in Corgan's favor, that will replace the current restraining order with a temporary injunction. With the injunction, the company will be unable to make major business decisions or sell the company without Corgan being involved in the decision. It was noted that a decision over whether Corgan takes over Dixie Carter's 92.5% voting rights could happen, although it appears that it won't because Corgan's attorney was being asked how they were applying Tennessee law to those claims. If the judge declines the injunction, then it's back to business as usual before Corgan filed the lawsuit. TNA management can continue to make business decisions, and proceed to sell shares of the company. Corgan would likely be paid off by Anthem Sports & Entertainment Corporation, which recently offered to pay back Corgan's loan to TNA. However, Corgan expects a 50% corporate transaction fee, which would be $900,000 of his $1.8 million loan, which Anthem's attorney said they were unwilling to pay. Anthem would then take 85% control of the company, with Aroluxe having a 10% stake and Dixie Carter retaining 5%. Anthem would fund the company, and there would only be 3-4 television tapings per year. Either way, Corgan's loan to TNA still has to be paid by next Tuesday, the day after the ruling. The lawsuit can also move forward regardless of Monday's ruling. You can read arguments from Billy Corgan's counsel at this link www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2016/1026/618780/news-from-billy-corgan-lawyer-at-tna-hearing-wwe-lowers-offer-to/and TNA attorneys here: www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2016/1026/618783/news-from-tna-lawyers-at-hearing-tna-cash-flow-problems-and-tax/
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Nov 1, 2016 8:38:27 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Nov 1, 2016 8:39:52 GMT -6
www.sescoops.com/tna-billy-corgan-court-decision-analysis-10-31-2016/How and Why TNA Won Judge’s Ruling Over Billy Corgan and Sidestepped An Injunction Our friend Ryan Satin of Pro Wrestling Sheet has posted the entire opinion entered today by Chancellor Ellen Hobbes Lyle in Billy Corgan’s lawsuit against TNA, its parent companies, and its managers, including Dixie Carter. As noted earlier, this opinion dissolved Corgan’s temporary restraining order against TNA (which kept the company from selling off shares and assets, signing contracts, etc.) and denied his request for an injunction. So, according to the honorable Chancellor Lyle, why did TNA prevail? According to the pledge agreement that Corgan and Carter signed on August 11th, Corgan would get power of attorney for Carter’s 92.5% of TNA if an “event of default” took place. According to Corgan, those “events of default” were not TNA’s non-repayment of the loan (it’s due tomorrow, November 1st), but actually these two issues: [T]he LLC has become insolvent. [T]he Defendants have breached by not performing their duty of keeping the Plaintiff informed about the financial condition of the LLC, and potential acquisition of the LLC and/or some of its assets. Chancellor Lyle ruled that the agreement “was not implemented in accordance with Tennessee law and [TNA’s] LLC Operating Agreement,” and as a result, Section 6, the relevant portion, “is, therefore, unenforceable to remove the Defendant LLC Managers.” The managers are Carter, her husband, Serg Salinas, and Chief Financial Officer Dean Broadhead, and they all had to consent for the agreement with Corgan to be valid. Obviously, he was lacking that consent. The court also found that Corgan’s underlying argument, that under the agreement, he was getting a proxy to Carter’s shares and not the actual shares, lacked merit. Specifically, on the individual issues, even if it was a valid agreement: Re: #1: “[T]he operative text of the Pledge Agreement, ‘becomes insolvent,’ is ambiguous when applied to the facts of record.” The relevant rules of procedure require “clear proof for issuance of an injunction” and “[t]he existence of an ambiguity does not constitute clear proof.” In addition, “ s identified by Defendants’ argument, inclusion of the word ‘becomes’ in the text must be taken into account. Tennessee contract construction rules require every word to be given effect, and none may be ignored, omitted or read out of the text.”
In other words? TNA couldn’t become insolvent if TNA already was insolvent. From Hobbes’ ruling:
It is undisputed that at the time the parties entered into the insolvency provision of the default section of the Pledge Agreement, the LLC was financially distressed. While the inference the Defendants seek for the Court to draw is that this distress was an anticipated temporary cash crunch from moving a license fee operation of the LLC to a barter system to maximize monetarization of the LLC’s content, the facts nevertheless are unrefuted that in 3months—June, July, August 2016—the LLC had to have huge infusions of cash from the Plaintiff to meet expenses and to produce its product or, as stated by Defendant Broadhead, “all would have been lost.”
The Court further finds that much of the Plaintiffs proof of insolvency, as would be expected, is not financial events and “snapshots” which occurred after the Pledge Agreement was entered into on August 11, 2016, but were conditions and events which had their inception and roots before August 11, 2016, which continued to worsen and deteriorate up to the present.
Due to the time constraints of working for the injunction, what Corgan was able to find amounting to proof of TNA becoming insolvent after August 11th was “that debts have increased 52% in the last 60 days ” and the following “collection and enforcement demands” from creditors (new or at least partially new information is in bold):
As of August 19, 2016, Impact Ventures was unable to pay American Express, prompting American Express to file suit to recover. As of August 31, 2016, Impact Ventures was unable to pay officers’ salaries. As of September 1, 2016, checks issued to talent bounced, and Dean Broadhead stated: “We owe talent money. We owe employees money, we [sic] many vendors money. As of September 8, 2016, the Tennessee Department of Revenue filed a tax lien against the company. As of September 8, 2016, Impact Venture’s operating account was overdrawn and the company had trade accounts payable. Re: #2:
“The parties have submitted competing and disputed versions of these facts such that the proof is not clear” as to whether or not TNA withheld or concealed information from Corgan. Corgan needed to prove a “substantial likelihood of success on the merits at trial that the Defendants breached by withholding information.” At this early juncture, with conflicting information from both sides, Hobbes didn’t think his case rose to that level.
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Nov 1, 2016 8:40:37 GMT -6
www.sescoops.com/billy-corgan-tweets-statement-on-judges-ruling-in-tna-lawsuit/Billy Corgan Tweets Statement On Judge’s Ruling In TNA Lawsuit By David Bixenspan on October 31, 2016 Billy Corgan tweeted these messages after word came out that he lost both his temporary restraining order against TNA and his request for a temporary injunction against the company: Follow WPC ✔ @billy For those asking, I'm in no way disappointed in the judges ruling regarding TNA. Rather, I'm grateful the judge considered the case 3:10 PM - 31 Oct 2016 92 92 Retweets 170 170 likes Follow WPC ✔ @billy It's important to note is these proceedings have brought forth facts which illuminate business practices I have fought against for a reason 3:14 PM - 31 Oct 2016 90 90 Retweets 163 163 likes Follow WPC ✔ @billy And I suggest that a careful reading on the judge's ruling supports there can be no claim of victory by anyone in a position of authority 3:19 PM - 31 Oct 2016 78 78 Retweets 153 153 likes If you’re having issues with the embeds, here’s the statement in its entirety: For those asking, I’m in no way disappointed in the judges ruling regarding TNA. Rather, I’m grateful the judge considered the case. It’s important to note is these proceedings have brought forth facts which illuminate business practices I have fought against for a reason. And I suggest that a careful reading on the judge’s ruling supports there can be no claim of victory by anyone in a position of authority. Update: And here is our post summarizing what you need to know about why the judge/chancellor ruled the way she did.
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Nov 1, 2016 8:42:14 GMT -6
www.sescoops.com/tna-major-legal-victory-over-billy-corgan/Major Legal Victory For TNA As Judge Rules Against Billy Corgan The online docket of Chancery Court in Nashville/Davidson County, Tennessee has been updated in Billy Corgan’s lawsuit against TNA, its parent companies, and its corporate managers (including Dixie Carter and her husband). It reads as follows: 10/31/2016 Chancellor’s Memorandum and Order Memorandum and Order Dissolving 10/13/16 Temporary Restraining Order and Denying Temporary Injunction This means that TNA is now free to sell pieces of the company again, sign new contracts, and so on. If Corgan still wants relief for what he believes is his rights to power of attorney for Dixie Carter’s 92.5% of the company, then he’s not getting it in court until he pushes the lawsuit to a settlement or a jury award. As outlined in court, TNA is expected to be sold to Anthem Sports and Entertainment, the parent company of The Fight Network, with Jason Brown of Aroluxe Media (minority shareholder) taking over as Chief Executive Officer. Presumably, Aroluxe will continue to produce the TV even with Anthem being the majority owner. Carter, who is believed to retain a small percentage in the proposed deal and has always looked to save face in these deals, will have a title and some kind of “owner emeritus” status. Update: Billy Corgan’s statement on the ruling can be read here. www.sescoops.com/billy-corgan-tweets-statement-on-judges-ruling-in-tna-lawsuit/And Another: Our distillation of what you need to know about why the judge/chancellor ruled the way she did can be read here. www.sescoops.com/tna-billy-corgan-court-decision-analysis-10-31-2016/
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Nov 1, 2016 8:43:54 GMT -6
www.sescoops.com/at-least-one-tna-wrestler-does-not-seem-happy-with-todays-news/At Least One TNA Wrestler Does Not Seem Happy With Today’s News TNA wrestler “Miracle” Mike Bennett tweeted this on Monday afternoon after news broke that Billy Corgan lost his bid to get an injunction against TNA: Follow Mike Bennett ✔ @realmikebennett Welp,back to bad business as usual 🙄 2:51 PM - 31 Oct 2016 300 300 Retweets 401 401 likes Last week, when the two sides were in court, Bennett’s wife and valet, former WWE star Maria Kanellis Bennett, tweeted this: Follow MariaKanellisBennett ✔ @marialkanellis Anyone else following @tnnaterau ? 1:47 PM - 26 Oct 2016 23 23 Retweets 52 52 likes That’s the Twitter handle of Nate Rau, a reporter from the Tennessean newspaper in Nashville, who was live tweeting the hearing. While numerous fans and some wrestlers followed Rau during the hearing, Maria was the only one to openly tweet about what was going on. It only makes sense: As noted earlier today, checks written to various talent bounced on September 1st. On top of that, Corgan had previously alleged that TNA told the roster that the restraining order/lawsuit was stopping the company from paying them on October 15th. The Bennetts, who left ROH and NJPW, were among the performers who signed with TNA this year for decent sized guarantees with the idea that the company would make it back by booking them out to independent promotions. That has not gone well so far.
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Nov 1, 2016 8:50:15 GMT -6
www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2016/1031/618934/more-on-tna-court-ruling/More On TNA Court Ruling, TNA Star Takes Shot At Ruling, Who Will Be In Charge, Video From Hearing As noted, Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle today ruled against Billy Corgan's request for a temporary injunction against TNA, which would have prevented the company from making major business decisions or sell the company without Corgan being involved in the decision. TNA can proceed to run the company without Corgan being involved. Corgan will be paid back for the loans he made to the company, which are due tomorrow, November 1st. Corgan is effectively out of the picture, although he could still move forward with his lawsuit. Corgan had made three loans to the company, with the third one having a provision that would have granted him Carter's 92.5% voting rights. The judge ruled that the provision was unenforceable. The company has until tomorrow, Tuesday, November 1st to repay Corgan's $1.8 million loan. Anthem Sports & Entertainment Corp., the parent company of the Fight Network, had previously agreed to repay Corgan, however were unwilling to pay a 50% corporate transaction fee, which would have been in the neighborhood of $900,000 of the $1.8 million loan. PWInsider noted that the court ruled that there is no reason for Corgan to be owed the transaction fee because there is no evidence on what has been filed so far that proves that there has been an acquisition of TNA and it's parent company. Corgan does have the option to convert that debt into a 36% ownership stake in the company, although that appears unlikely. Assuming that Anthem repays Corgan, that would reportedly give them 85% control of the company, with Aroluxe having a 10% stake and Dixie Carter retaining 5%. Jason Brown of Aroluxe, who has been running the day-to-day operations of the company, is expected to take over as President. PWInsider had recently reported that with Anthem in charge, there would only be 3-4 television tapings per year. You can check out video from the hearing above, via The Tennessean. As noted, Corgan commented on the ruling, writing on Twitter: www.tennessean.com/story/money/2016/10/31/corgan-loses-legal-effort-take-over-tna/93069526/For those asking, I'm in no way disappointed in the judges ruling regarding TNA. Rather, I'm grateful the judge considered the case. It's important to note is these proceedings have brought forth facts which illuminate business practices I have fought against for a reason. And I suggest that a careful reading on the judge's ruling supports there can be no claim of victory by anyone in a position of authority. At least one TNA wrestler didn't seem happy with the decision, as Mike Bennett wrote on Twitter: Follow Mike Bennett ✔ @realmikebennett Welp,back to bad business as usual 🙄 2:51 PM - 31 Oct 2016 300 300 Retweets 402 402 likes
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Nov 1, 2016 8:57:50 GMT -6
www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2016/1101/618950/billy-corgan-lawsuit-against-tna-is-apparently-still-moving/Billy Corgan's Lawsuit Against TNA Is Apparently Still Moving Forward Source: The Tennessean As noted, Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle today ruled against Billy Corgan's request for a temporary injunction against TNA, which would have prevented the company from making major business decisions or sell the company without Corgan being involved in the decision. TNA can proceed to run the company without Corgan being involved. Corgan loan repayment of $1.8 million is due tomorrow, Tuesday, November 1st. Corgan had made three loans to the company, with the third one having a provision that would have granted him Carter's 92.5% voting rights. The judge ruled that the provision was unenforceable. If TNA is unable to repay the loan by tomorrow, Corgan could take action or he could turn that debt into a 36% stake in the company. As noted, Anthem Sports & Entertainment Corp., the parent company of the Fight Network, had previously agreed to repay Corgan, however were unwilling to pay a 50% corporate transaction fee, which would have been in the neighborhood of $900,000. However, the court ruled that Corgan is not owed the transaction fee. Corgan's attorney had also tried to argue that the company was insolvent, however the judge rejected that due to "the ambiguous nature of the insolvency." As noted, the ruling was just over Corgan's motion for a temporary injunction, and not his lawsuit. It appears as if the lawsuit will proceed forward according to Corgan's attorney, Scott Simms. "Mr. Corgan understands that temporary injunctive relief is an extraordinary remedy and, due to the nature of the proceedings, he did not have full access to information in the defendants' possession that bears on the issues in this case," Sims said. "Mr. Corgan looks forward to the opportunity to conduct full discovery into these matters and present his case in its entirety to the Court at a later date."
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Nov 1, 2016 9:14:21 GMT -6
www.f4wonline.com/tna-news/judge-rejects-billy-corgans-efforts-take-over-tna-wrestling-223696JUDGE REJECTS BILLY CORGAN'S EFFORTS TO TAKE OVER TNA WRESTLING BY JOSH NASON | @joshnason | OCT 31, 2016 1:06 PM The drama that has unfolded over the last month regarding TNA's future continued in a Nashville, TN, courtroom Monday as Billy Corgan's request for control over the troubled wrestling company was rejected. In her ruling, Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle said that the temporary injunction Corgan was seeking didn't meet the burden of proof required to attain it. He is due to be paid back on several loans he had made the company that included the option to take over Carter's voting rights if TNA became insolvent. That was the basis of Corgan's case due to the amount of money TNA owes in contrast to the amount of revenue the company has. Corgan is due to be paid back on Tuesday, November 1st. The musician had sued the company, Dixie Carter, and more in an effort to get voting rights and control. Our Dave Meltzer tweeted: Aroluxe is the company that originally invested in TNA earlier this year to help keep the tapings alive and to buy into the company. Corgan began tweeting shortly after the decision (sic): We'll have more on this situation as it develops here on the site, and on tonight's post-Raw edition of Wrestling Observer Radio.
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Nov 4, 2016 10:50:40 GMT -6
www.pwinsider.com/article/105778/you-will-never-guess-why-tna-hasnt-paid-billy-corgan-back.html?p=1YOU WILL NEVER GUESS WHY TNA HASN'T PAID BILLY CORGAN BACK By Mike Johnson on 2016-11-04 12:01:00 TNA hasn't paid Billy Corgan the $1.8 million he is owed from his loans to the company, because, according to The New York Post, Corgan's hasn't asked TNA to give him back the money. In an article published this morning, The Post's Richard Morgan, who has been regularly reporting on the story, wrote that Corgan would, citing sources, get his $1.8 million investment in TNA back "when he asks for it." Corgan, after having his departure from TNA publicly announced, took to Twitter noting that he had yet to be paid back despite being told that TNA needed a day to get the money together. Based on his loan agreement with TNA, Corgan was required to be paid back on 11/1. Attorneys for Anthem, which took over control of TNA management yesterday, stated before the Nashville Chancery Court on 10/26 that they were willing and able to repay Corgan's investment. The article also noted, "TNA appears to have found that white knight in Anthem Sports. Carter still owns 92.5 percent of the company, TNA production house Aroluxe Marketing, 5 percent, and Anthem’s Fight Network, 2.5 percent." To read the complete article, click here. nypost.com/2016/11/04/billy-corgan-ousted-as-president-of-tna-wrestling/
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Nullifier on Nov 4, 2016 10:51:50 GMT -6
www.pwinsider.com/article/105779/billy-corgan-says-he-still-hasnt-been-paid-by-tna-and-finds-their-excuse-hard-to-believe-also-disputes-the-new-york-post-report-and-implies-he-will-sell-his-stake-to-wwe.html?p=1BILLY CORGAN SAYS HE STILL HASN'T BEEN PAID BY TNA AND FINDS THEIR EXCUSE HARD TO BELIEVE, ALSO DISPUTES THE NEW YORK POST REPORT AND IMPLIES HE WILL SELL HIS STAKE TO WWE By Dave Scherer on 2016-11-04 12:07:00 Billy Corgan has taken to Twitter to update where things stand between himself and TNA-Anthem/The Fight Network. YEP: just-published NY Post article asserts that judge in case ruled against my receiving 2.7 in Anthem swap deal. This is FALSE. Case OPEN — WPC (@billy) November 4, 2016 Today, I'm FORMALLY requesting repayment of my 'so-called' loan by TNA, which I'm told stalled because they didn't know where to FIND ME — WPC (@billy) November 4, 2016 Laughs aside I'd put up 1.8mil for express purpose of becoming equity stakeholder and helping talented roster. Any other assertion is FALSE — WPC (@billy) November 4, 2016 So if I'm not repaid today in full and without conditions attached, I'll be forced to once more pursue remedy by taking TNA stock via court — WPC (@billy) November 4, 2016 Remember it was Anthem and not I who stood in open court and told judge they were prepared to PAY and in turn FUND good 'ol, solvent TNA — WPC (@billy) November 4, 2016 A company which they claim they have no business deal for behind-the-scenes yet have released 2 press releases saying they are TAKING OVER — WPC (@billy) November 4, 2016 So far be it from me to accuse someone I don't know of bending truth to win a case. That just wouldn't be nice, and I believe in being nice — WPC (@billy) November 4, 2016 Last thing: despite being called a lender by every arm of TNA propaganda I can still convert to 36pct stock or sell option to highest bidder — WPC (@billy) November 4, 2016 And that 'option' if you will to convert my boo-hoo-hoo loan to 36pct stock or auction it off to a PW titan doesn't require a court order — WPC (@billy) November 4, 2016
|
|